Watching The U.S. Election Coverage was not a great viewer experience

I did not think that I would have any more to write regarding this week’s election once I sat down to watch the election returns Tuesday night. I always have enjoyed watching the Election Day returns. On Tuesday evening I started watching CBS and then bounced to NBC, ABC, FOX, CNN, MSNBC just to see what and how the various stations were handling it. For the most part the major over the air network approaches are similar with local breaks off the network every half hour.

The New York Times reported http://nyti.ms/WInBGH that this year 66.8 million people between 8 and 11, watched one of the 13 www.Nielsen.com networks that broadcast coverage. That’s down slightly from the 2008 election.

CBS (comes on first on my cable system TV when the box is turned on – no small thing), with Scott Pelley and the beautiful Norah O’Donnell (a reason to pay attention and I know she’s smart but even on TV I get mesmerized by those blue eyes) was doing a good job until the network went to local news at 11PM after NBC had just called the Presidential election for Barack Obama. Note to CBS – you totally blew ELECTION NIGHT coverage by running yet another story on Sandy (and other local stories) during a local break while NBC and ABC were eating your lunch. To make matters worse the clumsy hand over back to the network from capable NY local broadcaster Maurice Dubois was – awkward to say the least and unprofessional at worst. I wonder if there’s any correlation that CBS had far fewer viewers than NBC (the ratings winner) and FOX NEWS (not FOX network).

When I think about Election Day television coverage over the years it really has not changed all that much. The studio talking heads juxtaposed with in-the-field reporters on site at various campaign headquarters constitute dynamic television since the reports are changing constantly. That’s also a reason to watch. But I can’t stop thinking that the whole set-up could use a major refreshing.

That there was little evidence of social media included in the election coverage was surprising. Following the discussion on Twitter is a half-hearted attempt to seem like networks are attempting to engage their audience. Tweets would not have to be running constantly but most interesting tweets (as interpreted by the network) could be interspersed from viewers every 10 minutes in a box on the screen. Viewers have been known to stick with a network using this kind of tactic.

I also question whether local news breaks are even required and why relevant information in the local market could not be scrolled on the side of the screen (since election results scroll on the bottom) twice an hour. People are accustomed to busy screens (see MSNBC and FOX Cable News).

Overall I think the nature of election coverage could really use a refreshing. What do you think?

About markkolier

Futurist, entrepreneur, left lane driver
This entry was posted in Customer Experiences, Film and television, Media and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Watching The U.S. Election Coverage was not a great viewer experience

  1. I found Al Jazeera on YouTube to have great (and unbiased) coverage. Their use of technology, a large set, was refreshing. But they still went to on-site reporters. The panel of commentators was balanced as well.

    Like

  2. James McDonald says:

    I like your casual approaching In your writi ng. Yes those blue eyes certainly put you ahead of Wolf Blitzer.
    _
    I miss seeing You and Savannah on Morning Joe. Do you get to talk to her these days?

    Like

  3. Michael Berkman says:

    Mark,
    Had you watched my network, Current TV, you would have seen exactly what you wished for. Our election coverage featured half the screen covered with twitter feeds curated from pundits, politicians, comedians and just plain folk like you and I. Our hosts made up of two former Governors and someone who won a presidential election (oops), Al Gore, discussed and analysed many of the social media reactions and trends. Too bad you missed it. I watched CNN, MSNBC, Fox News an of course Current. But I was also watching my computer to make own “magic wall”. Nate Silver was a golden god!

    Like

    • markkolier says:

      Thanks Mike,

      Actually I did see just a bit of Current TV’s coverage since I knew you were involved. thought Current TV did a good job overall. What I would have liked is a split screen showing multiple networks at one time (like 12!) to bounce around. And Mr. Silver had a very good night indeed.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s